With the recent attacks a lot of discussion has been had about different elements that can be done to harden security on the chain.\n\nOne element was to improve infrastructure that validators run on, be this barebone or hosted it increases the cost to do so and keep doing so to secure the chain.\n\n0% commission makes it difficult to allow this to happen while being competitive with other validators. A recent 5% prop was voted down due to decreasing the delta for DynComm too much, as such 2.5% is being proposed as a happy medium
Submitted
18 Apr 2024, 09:23:37 UTC
Vote closed
25 Apr 2024, 10:32:47 UTC
Manual review needed
StatsBin could not safely infer execution semantics from the available message data.
Current or final voting power, calculated from the on-chain tally.
Quorum
Reached
Proposed values compared with the current module state. A difference may mean a later proposal superseded this one.
Staking Min Commission Rate
Objective network measurements at vote close plus 7, 30, and 90 days. Missing history is shown honestly, never backfilled with estimates.
Average block time
Preferred signal: context
7 days
A close-enough baseline and endpoint sample were not both available.
30 days
A close-enough baseline and endpoint sample were not both available.
90 days
A close-enough baseline and endpoint sample were not both available.
/cosmos.gov.v1.MsgExecLegacyContent/cosmos.params.v1beta1.ParameterChangeProposal84.29% participating
Approval
Passing
51.66% decisive Yes
Veto
Below threshold
0.41% of participation
What this message can change—not a prediction of price.
Staking ratio
Preferred signal: context
7 days
A close-enough baseline and endpoint sample were not both available.
30 days
A close-enough baseline and endpoint sample were not both available.
90 days
A close-enough baseline and endpoint sample were not both available.