I am proposing something very simple, but I believe that it will have a huge impact on the future on the Classic Chain. I am tired of validators claiming to be leaders but when a controversial vote comes up, they wait to see who is winning the battle and vote that way. I am proposing that we hide the voting result until the voting period ends. This will allow validators to either go with their gut or speak to their community about it and vote that way. I also propose that the option to remain abstain be either taken away or add a penalty to choosing this option (penalty amount established later). The majority, if not all, of the proposals should be decided on a yes or no vote. Keep in mind that no with veto can still be an option. This proposal is to improve our voting system to be fair and to encourage true leadership and not a follower’s mentality.
Submitted
07 Feb 2024, 11:32:05 UTC
Vote closed
17 Feb 2024, 10:49:51 UTC
Not approved
The proposal did not produce an approved governance action.
Current or final voting power, calculated from the on-chain tally.
Quorum
Reached
Objective network measurements at vote close plus 7, 30, and 90 days. Missing history is shown honestly, never backfilled with estimates.
Manual success criteria required
This proposal does not map cleanly to a chain-wide metric. Delivery evidence must come from its stated milestones.
/cosmos.gov.v1.MsgExecLegacyContent/cosmos.gov.v1beta1.TextProposal78.92% participating
Approval
Below threshold
1.41% decisive Yes
Veto
Below threshold
10.99% of participation
What this message can change—not a prediction of price.