Terra Classic statsLUNC · USTC · ON-CHAIN DATA
Reading the proposal and its separately reported chain context.
Loading the proposal. Its status, vote amounts and original source times will appear when the readings are ready.
Back to governanceWaiting for evidence.
Waiting for evidence.
Waiting for evidence.
Waiting for evidence.
This pending view does not establish a proposal result, current voting power or a successful source read.
Signal Proposal: Gauging Community Sentiment on Establishing an Official Community-Led Commonwealth Platform It is understood that anyone can create a Luna Classic Commonwealth to discuss future proposals, so technically, no governance vote is required. However, this proposal aims to depart from the current third-party arrangement to enhance moderation and ensure consistency by establishing an officially governed forum. The existing third-party platform has exhibited numerous inadequacies, serious cases of racism, doxxing, and harassment, poorly moderated and in most instances, not addressed at all, requiring urgent need for improvement. Various members of the Lunc Community who actively contribute have expressed their reluctance to utilize the existing platform due to the reasons enumerated. The objective behind this proposal is to bring forth a unified message that facilitates a fresh discussion forum, where we can foster constructive conversations in a safe and secure setting. It is believed that such a forum should be moderated fairly yet robustly; despite attempts to improve the existing platform, there has been no measurable improvement. To achieve unbiased moderation, it is proposed that a selection of community members/holders, as named below, monitor the platform. These individuals have voluntarily stepped forward and are named in the proposal as impartial holders of Luna Classic. None of the named moderators have any connections to validators, ensuring even coverage of the community as a whole and representation across various time zones. In alphabetical order: Boulay, Nicholay: @nicholayboulay Leonardo: @LeoTheFixer Pimentel2030: @KenyanL119 Sandeep: @sp0941995 Simon: @simo494868856 Vadys: @lunc119 Due to the evident conflict of interest, it was deemed appropriate to waive the recommended seven-day discussion on the current third-party platform and proceed directly to voting. Vote Yes: A new Commonwealth platform will be created with named moderators (any future moderation changes will require governance voting). Vote Abstain: You have no opinion for or against the new Commonwealth platform. Vote No: A new Commonwealth platform will not be created, and we will continue as is. No with Veto: Not applicable. Should this proposal pass, a request will be made to both TFL Station and Galaxy Station, adding the new Commonwealth link to the trusted links in future proposal text. This proposal was created as a full community effort, cosigned by: Air Force Lunc, Axiom Consortium, Ben Smith ( Lunable Labs), BRLG Lunc Brasil, cryptolitaz, Crypto Thai Community, Daniel Reichelmam, Derek, DNC, Evert, Faby Stark, FireFi Capital, Frag, Getty Investments, Lunaclassiclabs, Lunanauts, LUNCninja Node, LVS Node Validator, Mazaltech, MdicinalNFT , Morja Alex, NaatiePaat, Neung Handsome, Pink Unicorn, Raja Bibi, Romain Camus, Rostrum, SolidVote Validator, Strathcole, Tom Homes, Vegas, Ze Waffle
Connect Keplr to read your vote and review a new vote or update while the chain keeps voting open.
PASSED · Voting deadline
Your wallet holds the keys and approves each transaction. A submitted vote can have no voting power; participation weight and final eligibility are determined by the chain.
Submitted
20 Dec 2023, 17:45:12 UTC
Vote closed
27 Dec 2023, 18:55:49 UTC
Delivery proof needed
The vote records approval, but manual deliverables still need independent evidence.
Proposal status, current block and node version are separate responses with their own original clocks.
A reported PASSED status for routed protocol messages is consistent with successful governance handlers in supported SDK versions. The production fork and its version at execution are not independently established here. A text mandate still needs delivery evidence; a requested treasury payment is not a reconciled recipient payout.
Current block response metadata
Reported response header height: 30752601 · reported
Public requested / response origin: Withheld or unavailable / Withheld or unavailable
Node info response metadata
Current or final voting power, calculated from the on-chain tally.
Historical bonded stake and vote-close parameters are not available here. Turnout and threshold checks are withheld; the recorded proposal status remains authoritative.
Amounts use the separate tally endpoint response.
Selected tally
Current staking pool
Changes between retained samples near vote close and the 7, 30, and 90 day targets. Sample times and a 36 hour tolerance show how closely each pair matches its target.
Retained outcome assembly available
These retained comparisons have a separate assembly clock. It does not refresh the original proposal, block, node or parameter source clocks.
These times describe optional assembly, separate from retained sample capture times and original upstream response completion. Optional outcome work has a 1.2-second wait budget. Core reads and server load can make the total response take longer. The same admitted work continues after that wait; later requests can reuse its completed result. The original core cache and source clocks remain unchanged. No automatic page polling is added.
Manual success criteria required
This proposal does not map cleanly to a chain-wide metric. Delivery evidence must come from its stated milestones.
/cosmos.gov.v1.MsgExecLegacyContent/cosmos.gov.v1beta1.TextProposalReported response header height: 30752602 · reported
Public requested / response origin: Withheld or unavailable / Withheld or unavailable
Cached responses keep their original completion clocks. The block header time is a reported chain time, separate from HTTP completion and page assembly. Missing, invalid, future, wrong-chain or legacy source evidence is withheld. The block and node-info reads have no common-height guarantee; reported response metadata does not authenticate chain state.
A current block reaching an upgrade target does not prove software activation or validator adoption. A separately reported current node version does not establish the historical execution version or which proposal caused it. These responses do not independently verify execution receipts, recipient payouts or off-chain delivery.
Current tallying parameters
Current reported SDK context
The model uses SDK0.53.6/math1.5.3 fixed18-place quotient and half-even rounding on reported integer aggregates. Quorum allows equality; approval and veto require strictly greater shares. Expedited approval uses its separately returned expedited threshold. Missing supported SDK/rule/threshold evidence withholds decisions. Internal fractional voting power and production custom tally logic are not reconstructed or independently established.
Cached inputs keep their original completion clocks. These independently read responses have no common-height guarantee; reported headers do not authenticate chain state. Missing, invalid, future or legacy evidence is withheld. Reported zero votes stay zero; unavailable amounts are not zero votes.
Current stake and thresholds are shown only as current context. They are not used to reconstruct a closed proposal’s turnout or threshold result. This does not establish historical voter eligibility, voting weights or vote-close rules. Amounts are approximate displayed LUNC from reported micro amounts; these reads do not verify execution, payouts or delivery.
Quorum
Not available
Participation unavailable
Approval
Not available
87.58% decisive Yes
Veto
Not available
0.54% of participation
What this message can change—not a prediction of price.