This is a proposal requesting a change to the maximum vote power. Due to recent events, it has been noticed that some validators may not be acting with the best interests of the community (Spreading misinformation and FUD) Validators should always provide a suitable explanation for a 'NO' vote Especially when it concerns Ocatgon and the entire chain. Otherwise they should ABSTAIN or simply not vote at all untill an explanation is given. For this reason i am suggesting a cap to be set at 8% and rewards be diluted for those who are staked with validators over the max cap. Without a cap the chain could be damaged by future bad actors, And lose its decentralisation. I ask all validators to consider this proposal seriously before voting. Thanks! Chrono
Submitted
20 Aug 2023, 15:21:54 UTC
Vote closed
27 Aug 2023, 16:00:12 UTC
Not approved
The proposal did not produce an approved governance action.
Current or final voting power, calculated from the on-chain tally.
Quorum
Reached
Objective network measurements at vote close plus 7, 30, and 90 days. Missing history is shown honestly, never backfilled with estimates.
Manual success criteria required
This proposal does not map cleanly to a chain-wide metric. Delivery evidence must come from its stated milestones.
/cosmos.gov.v1.MsgExecLegacyContent/cosmos.gov.v1beta1.TextProposal41.07% participating
Approval
Below threshold
11.08% decisive Yes
Veto
Below threshold
0.48% of participation
What this message can change—not a prediction of price.