See how turnout, abstention and veto change a hypothetical outcome. Compare two scenarios side by side.
Local hypothetical math · editable illustrative rules
Compare two distributions of abstract voting-power units. The initial examples use the same turnout and Yes power, but different Abstain power. Rules are example assumptions, not fetched chain parameters. Results do not predict a real proposal, validator vote, execution or spend.
Passes these illustrative rules
Approval not reached
Quorum includes Abstain and passes at equality. Approval excludes Abstain and must strictly exceed the chosen ordinary or expedited fraction. Veto divides veto power by all participating power, including Abstain, and blocks only above its fraction. Zero denominators stay undefined.
Ratios reuse StatsBin’s reported aggregate model for Cosmos SDK 0.53.6 / math 1.5.3: division at 36 decimal places, then half-even rounding to 18. This does not authenticate internal voting power, reconstruct delegator overrides or establish which implementation a real proposal used.
All entries remain local to this page. No inputs are submitted, stored or sent to a wallet. Use consistent whole units; these are hypothetical units, not validator counts or current token holdings.